AIai safety & ethicsResponsible AI
Here’s how to protect your privacy when using AI assistants
Do you share your innermost thoughts with ChatGPT? You might want to think twice—or at least change your settings fast. This isn't just a casual tech tip; it's a fundamental question about the new social contract we're drafting with artificial intelligence.As someone who spends his days at the intersection of AI policy and ethics, I'm reminded of Isaac Asimov's First Law of Robotics: a robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. Yet, here we are, voluntarily whispering our secrets into systems with no such hardwired imperative, governed by corporate terms of service rather than a moral framework.The privacy risks with AI assistants are profound and multifaceted. Every prompt you enter, every question you ask, becomes data that can be used to refine the model, yes, but also data that could be subpoenaed, hacked, or, in a more mundane but equally concerning scenario, inadvertently exposed by the company itself through a bug or a rogue employee.Consider the broader context: we've spent decades grappling with data privacy for search engines and social media, leading to regulations like GDPR in Europe and CCPA in California. AI assistants, however, represent a qualitative leap.They are not just cataloging our clicks; they are being trained on the contours of our curiosity, our anxieties, our professional dilemmas, and our creative sparks. The historical precedent isn't Google; it's the confessional, or the therapist's couch, now mediated by a silicon intermediary with a profit motive.Expert commentary from figures like Dr. Rumman Chowdhury, a leading AI ethicist, often highlights the 'alignment problem'—ensuring AI's goals align with human values.Privacy is the bedrock of that alignment. If we cannot trust these systems with our personal data, the entire project of beneficial AI stumbles.The possible consequences of getting this wrong are not merely individual; they are societal. We risk creating a chilling effect where people self-censor in their interactions with what could be the most powerful tool for education and creativity ever invented, for fear of exposure or judgment.Analytically, the core tension is between utility and vulnerability. To serve you perfectly, an AI arguably needs to know you intimately.But that intimacy creates a digital shadow self, a latent profile more detailed than any social media footprint. The solutions aren't just in your settings—though you should immediately disable chat history and model training where possible—but in demanding architectural shifts: true on-device processing, robust federated learning models, and transparent, auditable data governance. The future isn't about abandoning these tools, but about building them with the foresight Asimov imagined, where protection is not an optional feature but the foundational protocol.
#privacy
#AI assistants
#ChatGPT
#settings
#data security
#user awareness
#editorial picks news
