Politicsgovernments & cabinetsPolicy Agendas
Government’s process behind tackling violence against women ‘worse than under the Tories’
As the Labour government prepares to unveil its long-awaited strategy on violence against women and girls next week, the very process behind its creation is being condemned by leading campaigners as chaotic, haphazard, and—in a damning indictment—even worse than the approach taken under the previous Conservative administration. This criticism, delivered in stark terms to The Guardian, reveals a profound disconnect between the new administration's rhetoric of change and the reality of its policymaking, where experts and frontline organisations feel systematically sidelined.The core accusation is that, in a rush to announce a flagship policy, ministers have orchestrated a blitz of pre-publication announcements while failing to engage in the meaningful, collaborative consultation that such a grave and systemic issue demands. This isn't merely bureaucratic friction; it’s a failure of process that risks producing a strategy built on political expediency rather than the hard-won expertise of those who have spent decades supporting survivors and challenging the cultural and institutional frameworks that enable such violence.The historical precedent here is critical. The Tory years were often marked by austerity-driven cuts to refuges and support services, yet even within that constrained landscape, there existed channels—however imperfect—for dialogue.The current charge suggests a more top-down, controlled approach, where input is sought as a formality rather than a foundation, echoing the very patriarchal structures the strategy purports to dismantle. One must consider the personal impact of such exclusion: these organisations hold the data on what works, the testimonies that reveal gaps in legal protection, and the on-the-ground understanding of how policies translate—or fail to translate—into safety for a woman fleeing her abuser.To sideline them is to ignore the lived reality of the crisis in favour of political messaging. The potential consequences are severe.A strategy developed without this cornerstone of expertise could misallocate vital resources, overlook emerging forms of digital and economic abuse, and lack the nuanced, intersectional approach needed for Black, minoritised, disabled, and migrant women who face compounded barriers. It risks being a document that looks impressive in a press release but falters in implementation, leaving service providers to grapple with ill-conceived mandates while survivor support falls through the cracks.From a human perspective, this process failure feels like a betrayal. After a change in government, there was a palpable hope for a new era of partnership, one that would treat violence against women and girls as the national emergency it is.
#violence against women
#government strategy
#Labour
#campaigners
#criticism
#policy announcement
#featured