California’s next big one could be faster and far more destructive15 hours ago7 min read999 comments

The very ground beneath California, long accepted as a precarious but predictable neighbor, is now revealing a more volatile and terrifying personality. The latest research from USC sounds an alarm that should reverberate from the redwood forests to the Mojave Desert: the state’s next great earthquake could be a 'supershear' event, a geological monster that moves faster than the seismic waves themselves, unleashing a focused, directional blast of energy that our current construction standards are woefully unprepared to withstand.Imagine the difference between the rolling, nauseating swell of a typical major quake and the violent, targeted lash of a whip; this is the fundamental shift in threat that seismologists are now mapping onto the state’s complex web of faults. These aren't merely theoretical concerns confined to academic papers.Faults capable of producing magnitude 7 quakes, which crisscross populated regions, have been identified as potential hosts for these explosive ruptures. The 1994 Northridge earthquake offered a grim, partial preview, but a full supershear event, like the 2018 Palu earthquake in Indonesia that liquefied the earth and tore apart the landscape in seconds, would concentrate its destructive fury along a narrow corridor, potentially shaking the life out of cities for a longer, more intense duration.The physics are chillingly simple: when a fault rupture outruns its own seismic shear waves, it creates a sonic boom effect in the ground, channeling energy forward with devastating efficiency. This means that a fault line running north-south could direct its worst shaking east-west, turning entire blocks of buildings—structures built to code for omnidirectional shaking—into perfectly aligned targets for catastrophic failure.The implications for California’s infrastructure are staggering. We have spent decades and billions of dollars retrofitting bridges and reinforcing concrete frames based on a model of shaking that this new research renders incomplete.It’s an ecological and societal crisis in the making, a failure to adapt our built environment to the true nature of the tectonic forces we coexist with. The urgent call from the scientific community is not for panic, but for a profound and immediate upgrade in both monitoring and building codes.We need a dense network of sensors capable of detecting the unique signature of a supershear rupture in its first terrifying seconds, buying precious moments for automated shutdowns and warnings. More critically, our architectural resilience must evolve.We must mandate designs that account for this directional punching force, requiring engineers to think not just about how much a building can shake, but from which direction the knockout blow will come. This is a moment that demands the same level of political will and public investment that we muster for other existential threats.To ignore this data is to gamble with millions of lives on the assumption that the earth will continue to play by the old rules. The science is clear: the rules have changed, and California’s next big one could be faster, more focused, and far more destructive than we ever planned for.