Trump Threatens to Cancel Xi Meeting Over Rare Earths
In a move that sent geopolitical shockwaves through global capitals, US President Donald Trump on Friday threatened to cancel a planned high-stakes meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping, framing Beijing's recent expansion of export controls on rare earth elements as a 'hostile' act of economic warfare. This escalation is not merely a trade skirmish; it is a calculated gambit in the long-running strategic competition between the world's two largest economies, reminiscent of the resource blockades and economic statecraft that have historically preceded more direct confrontations.The immediate catalyst was a terse social media post from the former president, wherein he expressed being 'surprised' by China's maneuver, a move he claimed would 'clog markets' and cripple global production chains across a swath of critical industries from electric vehicles and advanced weaponry to consumer electronics and renewable energy technology. 'There is no way that China should be allowed to hold the world 'captive,'' he declared, branding the policy as 'sinister and' a blatant attempt at coercion.This development must be viewed through the sobering lens of history and raw material dominance. Rare earths—a group of seventeen obscure metallic elements with magnetic and phosphorescent properties—are the unsung heroes of modern technology, and China currently commands a near-monopoly, refining approximately 90% of the global supply.This is not an accidental advantage but the result of a decades-long, state-directed industrial policy that systematically consolidated the entire supply chain, from mining to magnet manufacturing, while Western nations largely offshored their own production capabilities for short-term economic gain. The shadow of 2010 looms large in this context, when China abruptly slashed rare earth exports to Japan during a territorial dispute, sending prices soaring and triggering a global panic that exposed the West's profound vulnerability.While the World Trade Organization eventually ruled against such overt restrictions, China has since refined its tactics, now leveraging more subtle tools like export licenses, environmental audits, and value-added taxes to constrict supply without triggering outright legal challenges. President Xi's government is now wielding this 'asymmetric advantage' with greater confidence, signaling that it will not hesitate to weaponize its control over these critical inputs in response to Western sanctions or technological containment efforts, such as the sweeping bans on semiconductor exports to Chinese firms.For the United States and its allies, the threat is existential to their green energy transitions and national security apparatus. The Pentagon's F-35 fighter jet, for instance, requires hundreds of kilograms of rare earth magnets; a single Virginia-class submarine needs nearly four tons.The abrupt severing of this supply would bring assembly lines from Detroit to Stuttgart to a grinding halt within months. In response, the U.S. has initiated efforts to resuscitate its domestic rare earth industry, with projects like the Mountain Pass mine in California and nascent processing facilities in Texas, but these initiatives remain years away from achieving meaningful scale and, critically, lack the sophisticated separation capacity to produce the high-purity metals and alloys required by manufacturers.Furthermore, building a parallel, secure supply chain free from Chinese intellectual property and processing expertise presents a monumental technical and financial challenge, one that private industry is reluctant to undertake without massive, long-term government subsidies and guaranteed offtake agreements. The geopolitical calculus is further complicated by the fact that alternative sources, such as the promising Lynas facility in Australia or nascent projects in Africa, are often still dependent on Chinese refining infrastructure or are themselves subject to Beijing's growing influence through its Belt and Road Initiative investments.Analysts from the Center for Strategic and International Studies warn that Trump's threat to cancel the Xi summit is a high-risk bluff, a tactic intended to project strength but one that could easily backfire, pushing Beijing to accelerate its decoupling efforts and solidify economic alliances with non-aligned nations. The potential cancellation of such a diplomatic channel removes a critical pressure valve, increasing the likelihood of a protracted, tit-for-tat economic conflict that could bifurcate global technology standards and supply chains into distinct Sino-American spheres.The ultimate consequence extends far beyond trade deficits; it strikes at the heart of technological supremacy in the 21st century. Whoever controls the supply of these critical materials effectively holds the keys to the next industrial revolution, from artificial intelligence and quantum computing to the global transition to a low-carbon economy. This is not just a dispute over minerals; it is a fundamental struggle over the architecture of the future world order, and the current escalation suggests the battle lines are being drawn with ever-sharper clarity.
It’s quiet here...Start the conversation by leaving the first comment.
© 2025 Outpoll Service LTD. All rights reserved.