UK role in Gaza peace settlement questioned by US figures2 hours ago7 min read999 comments

The fragile harmony of the Gaza peace settlement was immediately tested by a discordant note in the transatlantic alliance, as U. S.Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee publicly labeled UK Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson 'delusional' for her assertion that Britain played a key role in shaping the agreement. This diplomatic spat, erupting just as world leaders convened in Egypt to celebrate the initial hostage release and chart the precarious path forward, reveals more than mere political posturing; it exposes the raw nerve of influence and legacy in one of the world's most intractable conflicts.Phillipson’s Sunday media round, where she articulated a vision of significant UK contribution, was not an isolated comment but part of a broader narrative the British government has been carefully constructing, pointing to behind-the-scenes diplomatic channels and the quiet, persistent counsel of senior British figures in nudging parties toward the negotiating table. Yet, Huckabee’s sharp rebuke on social media platform X echoes a long-standing American posture, reminiscent of historical moments where the U.S. , as the primary arbiter in Middle East peace processes from Camp David to the Oslo Accords, has viewed European partners as secondary players, their contributions often acknowledged politely but rarely considered decisive.This incident forces a critical examination of the UK’s post-Brexit foreign policy doctrine and its capacity for independent global statecraft, a question that harkens back to the era of Churchill and Eden, when British influence was a tangible, commanding force on the world stage. Analysts are now dissecting whether this is a temporary friction or a symptom of a deeper strategic divergence, with potential consequences for the coordinated international pressure needed to ensure the peace deal’s next phases—addressing governance, reconstruction, and a lasting political solution—do not collapse under the weight of such public disagreements among its purported guarantors.