Hong Kong Ombudsman Criticizes Care Homes for Poor Management5 days ago7 min read999 comments

The recent investigation by Hong Kong’s Ombudsman into the city’s care homes reveals a systemic failure that transcends mere bureaucratic oversight, striking at the very heart of our social contract and the gendered expectation of care that so often falls upon women, both as unpaid family caregivers and as the predominant workforce within these undervalued institutions. The report’s findings—of facilities being unduly selective in their admission processes, of beds lying empty while a waiting list of over 40,000 elderly citizens languishes, of a 'lukewarm attitude' from management that borders on institutional neglect—paints a damning portrait of a system in crisis, one that mirrors the global devaluation of care work as 'soft' and less critical.This is not simply a matter of poor management; it is a profound policy failure that reflects a societal ambivalence towards our aging population, a demographic wave that Hong Kong, with one of the world's longest life expectancies, is uniquely ill-prepared to handle. The core issue lies in a resource allocation model that is both inefficient and inequitable, where funding does not adequately incentivize homes to accept the most vulnerable, particularly those with higher dependency needs who require more intensive, and thus more costly, support.We must view this through a lens of feminist economics, which has long argued that the market fundamentally fails to account for the true value of care, leading to chronic underinvestment and the exploitation of a predominantly female labor force. The ombudsman’s call for strengthened supervision is a necessary first step, but it must be coupled with a radical rethinking of how we value dignity in old age.We can look to the Nordic model, where municipal oversight is robust and funding is tied to quality outcomes and occupancy of the most in-need, not just to bed numbers. The consequences of inaction are dire: a generation of elders facing institutional isolation, families torn apart by the stress of navigating an unresponsive system, and a festering social wound that betrays the Confucian values of filial piety that Hong Kong purports to uphold.This is a moment for leadership, for the Social Welfare Department to move beyond timid recommendations and enact a rights-based framework for elderly care, ensuring that these homes become centers of community and compassion, not merely warehouses for the forgotten. The personal is political, and in the quiet desperation of an unused care home bed, we see the reflection of a policy failure that demands not just review, but a revolution in empathy and action.