Property experts urge Rachel Reeves to abolish ‘sin tax’ of stamp duty in budget

2 hours ago7 min read1 comments

In a significant pre-budget intervention, a coalition of prominent property experts, including television presenter Kirstie Allsopp, has formally urged Chancellor Rachel Reeves to abolish what they term the 'sin tax' of stamp duty, advocating instead for a systemic overhaul towards an annual property tax. This call for reform strikes at the heart of a long-standing and contentious feature of the UK housing market, a levy that has repeatedly been criticized for creating damaging distortions and acting as a direct brake on mobility and transaction fluidity.Allsopp, whose authority stems from years fronting Channel 4's property programming like *Location, Location, Location*, reported a tangible atmosphere of panic among potential buyers and sellers, who are now 'sitting tight' in a state of suspended animation ahead of the November 26th fiscal statement, fearful of imminent changes but hopeful for meaningful structural reform. The current stamp duty land tax (SDLT) functions as a substantial transactional cost, a lump-sum payment that can amount to tens of thousands of pounds on an average family home, creating a notorious 'log jam' effect where people are disincentivized from moving, thereby constricting supply and exacerbating affordability crises.Proponents of the alternative—a yearly property tax based on current valuations—argue it would create a smoother, more predictable revenue stream for the Treasury while dismantling the major barrier to downsizing, upsizing, or relocating for work that SDLT represents. From a macroeconomic perspective, the debate pits the immediate fiscal yield of a transaction tax against the long-term economic benefits of a more dynamic housing market; a fluid property sector is a critical lubricant for the entire economy, influencing everything from retail spending on new furnishings to the efficient allocation of labour across regions.The Treasury, now under Reeves' stewardship, is understood to be actively considering such an overhaul, weighing the political palatability of shifting the tax burden from a one-time buyer to a recurring charge on homeowners against the potential for unlocking significant economic activity. Historical precedents are instructive; previous temporary stamp duty holidays, such as the one implemented post-pandemic, led to dramatic surges in market activity, proving conclusively how sensitive the sector is to this particular cost.However, critics of an annual tax warn of the administrative complexity of frequent revaluations and the potential for it to become a deeply unpopular stealth tax on the perceived value of one's home. The core of the argument, however, rests on efficiency and fairness: does it make more sense to heavily tax a socially beneficial activity like moving house, or to institute a broader, lower-rate tax that spreads the cost of public services more evenly across the entire property-owning base? For the Chancellor, this is not merely a technical tax adjustment but a fundamental choice about the kind of housing market—and by extension, the kind of economy—the government wishes to foster. The fervent pleas from experts like Allsopp amplify a growing consensus that the current system is broken, and the budget presents a pivotal moment to replace a punitive 'sin tax' with a modern, efficient mechanism designed for the 21st century.

#featured

#stamp duty

#property tax

#UK budget

#Rachel Reeves

#real estate market

#Kirstie Allsopp

Stay Informed. Act Smarter.

Get weekly highlights, major headlines, and expert insights — then put your knowledge to work in our live prediction markets.

Comments

Loading comments...