Gunther Steiner Criticizes FIA Over Mexican Grand Prix Decisions.

3 days ago7 min read

In a blistering critique that felt more like a final lap overtake than a casual observation, former Haas F1 Team Principal Gunther Steiner unleashed his signature unfiltered perspective on the FIA's officiating during the Mexican Grand Prix, labeling the governing body as his definitive 'wanker' in the 'Rockstar and Wanker' segment of The Red Flags podcast. Steiner, whose tenure at Haas was defined by his straight-talking, no-nonsense approach that often cut through the political fog of the F1 paddock, didn't just scratch the surface; he dove headfirst into the core inconsistency plaguing the sport.'It's the usual candidate,' he began, his tone laced with the weary frustration of a team boss who has seen this movie too many times, promising a season-end tally where the FIA would likely 'win' one championship by a landslide. His central thesis was a damning indictment of a systemic failure: 'What is going on? What is this? We're talking about this topic up and down, left and right – what is happening?' This wasn't merely about a single bad call in Mexico City's high-altitude chaos; it was about a pattern of decision-making that leaves drivers, teams, and fans in a state of perpetual confusion, akin to a referee in a crucial Champions League final making a series of contradictory offside calls that ultimately decide the trophy.He pointed to Fernando Alonso's public exasperation over start-line incidents where penalties were applied with baffling selectivity—'some are punished, some are not. You can do whatever you want'—a sentiment echoing through the garage of every mid-field team fighting for precious championship points.Steiner was careful to clarify his target wasn't the individuals within the FIA, whom he acknowledged are often in impossible positions, but the very structure and process that seemingly sets them up to fail, a system where 'people practically have no chance to show themselves in a good light. ' This goes beyond the immediate drama of the Lawson-marshal near-miss, which the FIA curiously absolved of blame despite visceral video evidence and accusations from the Mexican federation, and strikes at the heart of F1's credibility.To understand the weight of Steiner's words, one must look at the historical context: the FIA has long grappled with consistency, from the controversial 'track limits' debates at the Austrian Grand Prix to the labyrinthine regulations around flexible wings and engine modes. Each incident creates a new layer of precedent, or rather, the lack thereof, making the rulebook feel less like a definitive guide and more like a living document open to interpretation based on the day, the circuit, and the drivers involved.This erodes the sport's foundational principle of a level playing field, turning each Grand Prix weekend into not just a battle of engineering and driver skill, but a high-stakes lottery of judicial outcomes. The consequences are tangible: team principals are forced to allocate significant resources to 'lobbying' race control during sessions, a distraction from pure competition, while drivers are increasingly hesitant to engage in wheel-to-wheel combat for fear of an arbitrary penalty that could wipe out a weekend's work.Experts in sports governance would argue that this kind of inconsistent application of rules is a primary driver of fan disillusionment; when the outcome feels predetermined or unfairly influenced by officiating, the essential drama of sport is compromised. Looking forward, the FIA faces a critical juncture.With new technical regulations aiming to close the competitive field, the spotlight on sporting regulations and their enforcement will only intensify. The solution, as Steiner's broadside implies, may not lie in hiring different people, but in a radical overhaul of the decision-making framework itself—perhaps incorporating more real-time, transparent technology akin to football's VAR, or establishing a permanent, independent panel of stewards that travels to every race to ensure a consistent philosophical approach. Until then, voices like Steiner's will continue to ring out, not as mere complaints, but as a necessary call to action for a sport whose global appeal demands a governance structure as elite and reliable as the machines and athletes it purports to regulate.

#Formula 1

#FIA

#Gunther Steiner

#Mexican Grand Prix

#race officials

#criticism

#lead focus news

Stay Informed. Act Smarter.

Get weekly highlights, major headlines, and expert insights — then put your knowledge to work in our live prediction markets.