Plyushchev criticizes SKA's play and questions Larionov's lineup decisions.
10 hours ago7 min read0 comments

The hockey world is buzzing after SKA's painful 2-1 overtime defeat to Avtomobilist, a result that leaves the storied army club languishing in a precarious eighth place in the Western Conference with a middling 13 points from 13 games—a record that screams mediocrity and has prompted sharp criticism from former Russian national team coach Vladimir Plyushchev, who didn't hold back in his assessment. Speaking with the kind of blunt, analytical fervor that would make any football statistician proud, Plyushchev zeroed in directly on head coach Igor Larionov's perplexing lineup decisions, particularly the curious case of Nikolai Goldobin, a player SKA pursued with the relentless, circling intensity of a shark for years, finally prizing him away from Spartak only to seemingly bench him at crucial moments.'I don't know what the tasks are for the current SKA,' Plyushchev mused, his tone laced with a mix of bewilderment and sarcasm, 'but based on the current roster, questions have to be asked of Larionov. I suppose they are saving Goldobin for the playoffs, and removing him for the match against Lokomotiv was a tactical substitution,' he added with a knowing laugh that spoke volumes about the perceived absurdity of the move.This isn't just a minor roster tinker; it's a strategic head-scratcher reminiscent of a football manager inexplicably benching his star striker in a cup final, a decision that can define a season and a legacy. Plyushchev’s core indictment, however, cuts deeper than any single player's ice time: 'At present, SKA has a drab and unconvincing game.You look at the scoreboard, it determines everything. The playing surface shows you who is worth what,' he stated, a verdict that frames the team's struggles not as a run of bad luck, but as a fundamental failure of execution and identity on the ice.This is a team that, on paper, boasts a roster with the firepower of a hockey equivalent of FC Barcelona's legendary MSN trio, yet they are playing with the disjointed confusion of a pickup squad, their potential stifled by hesitant play and questionable tactical deployments. The context here is critical; SKA is not some plucky underdog but a Goliath of the Kontinental Hockey League, a club with immense financial resources and a championship pedigree that demands consistent excellence, making this early-season stumble all the more glaring.Larionov, for his part, has spoken of being 'close to overcoming the anxieties and failures that are pursuing us,' urging his squad to 'look for reserves inside themselves,' a classic coach's plea for mental fortitude that, while noble, rings somewhat hollow when the on-ice product remains so visibly flawed. The great debate now unfolding among pundits and fans alike is whether this is a temporary slump, the kind every great team endures, or a symptom of a deeper systemic rot—a misalignment between Larionov's philosophical approach, perhaps inherited from his days as 'The Professor' on the ice, and the gritty, relentless demands of the modern KHL regular season.One must consider the historical precedent; dynasties in any sport, from the Soviet Red Army team of the 70s and 80s to the Chicago Blackhawks of the 2010s, have all faced moments of reckoning where their core strategies were tested, and their responses defined their eras. For SKA, the consequences of failing to right this ship are severe: missing the playoffs or an early exit would be nothing short of a catastrophe, triggering a potential front-office overhaul and a fire sale of the very talent they worked so hard to assemble.The pressure is squarely on Larionov to prove he can be more than a hockey intellectual and become a pragmatic problem-solver, to find a way to unlock Goldobin's undeniable offensive gifts and mold this collection of individual stars into a cohesive, intimidating unit that dominates the ice as decisively as Pep Guardiola's Barcelona dominated the pitch. Until then, as Plyushchev so aptly noted, the scoreboard and the uninspired play will continue to tell the true, unforgiving story.