Hong Kong leader says Exco will not change after resignations.2 days ago7 min read3 comments

In a political landscape often defined by its volatility, Hong Kong’s leader has delivered a message of steadfast continuity, signaling that the government’s paramount decision-making body, the Executive Council, will not undergo a reshuffle despite a significant exodus of its veteran members. This declaration comes as half of the eight seasoned lawmakers serving as his advisers have announced they will not contest the upcoming Legislative Council elections, a development that in many other jurisdictions would precipitate a significant political realignment.The latest to join this retreat is Martin Liao Cheung-kong, a 68-year-old fixture in Legco since 2012 and a figure affectionately dubbed the “class monitor” of the pro-establishment camp, whose departure marks the end of an era for a particular style of consensus-building politics. To understand the full weight of this non-reshuffle, one must look to the historical precedents that shape Hong Kong's unique political character, a system where stability is often prized above all else, reminiscent of the careful, deliberate governance one might observe in a long-standing parliamentary democracy facing internal party shifts.The Executive Council, or Exco, functions not unlike a cabinet in a Westminster system, yet its role is intrinsically tied to the Chief Executive's agenda, serving as the final deliberative body before major policies are enacted. The departure of figures like Liao, who brought decades of institutional memory and a reputation for mediating within the often-fractious pro-establishment bloc, raises immediate questions about the council's future dynamic and its capacity for nuanced internal debate.Historically, such collective withdrawals can be interpreted as a strategic consolidation, a clearing of the deck for a new generation of leaders who may hew more closely to a unified political line, a move not without parallel in the annals of political history where veteran figures sometimes step aside to make way for a more disciplined cohort. Expert commentary from political analysts suggests this is less a sign of internal discord and more a calculated maneuver to refresh the territory’s political front without altering its fundamental strategic direction.The possible consequences are multifaceted; while administrative continuity is assured in the short term, the loss of such experienced voices could dilute the council's reservoir of pragmatic wisdom, potentially leading to a more technocratic and less politically astute advisory body. This could, in turn, affect the quality of legislation and policy formulation, particularly on complex domestic issues like housing and economic competitiveness, where Liao’s pragmatic approach was often cited as a valuable asset.Furthermore, this development must be analyzed within the broader context of Hong Kong’s political evolution post-2020, where the emphasis has been overwhelmingly on stability and national security, priorities that may favor a cohesive and predictable Exco over one brimming with independent-minded veterans. The narrative here is not one of crisis, but of a managed transition, a deliberate choice to maintain the status quo in the upper echelons of power even as the electoral landscape below undergoes its own transformation. This analytical insight points to a governance model prioritizing long-term control and predictability, a stark contrast to the more tumultuous political reshuffles seen in other world capitals, and a testament to a calculated political strategy where the appearance of unwavering continuity is itself a powerful message to both domestic and international observers.