- News
- exchanges
- Hyperliquid founder criticizes CEXs for underreporting liquidation data after market wipeout
Hyperliquid founder criticizes CEXs for underreporting liquidation data after market wipeout
In the smoking crater of last week's crypto market wipeout, a bombshell accusation has been leveled that cuts to the very heart of trust in our financial systems. Jeff Yan, the co-founder of the decentralized exchange Hyperliquid, didn't just point out the carnage; he pulled back the curtain on what he alleges is a systemic deception by the centralized exchange (CEX) establishment.His claim is as simple as it is damning: some of these behemoths, the very platforms millions trust with their capital, may have underreported their liquidation data by a factor of one hundred. Let that number sink in.One hundred times. This isn't a minor accounting discrepancy; this is a chasm between the narrative they sold the public and the brutal reality unfolding in their back-end systems.For anyone who has been in this space since the early days, this feels like a familiar, gut-wrenching echo. We've seen this movie before—the opaque ledgers, the whispered truths on Telegram channels that never make it to the official blog posts, the sudden halts of withdrawals when the leverage gets too hot.The CEX model, for all its slick user interfaces and marketing bluster, is fundamentally built on a foundation of 'trust us. ' They are the black boxes of finance, the modern-day versions of the gilded banks of the 1920s, and they demand we take their word for it while they profit from our activity.What Yan is suggesting is that this trust has been, once again, catastrophically misplaced. When a cascade of liquidations hits, it's not just a statistic; it's a wealth transfer of epic proportions.It's the forced selling of a trader's position at a fire-sale price, with the exchange's liquidation engine pocketing the difference. If the true scale of these liquidations was one hundred times larger than reported, it implies a level of leverage and systemic risk so profound that it makes the entire ecosystem look like a house of cards.This isn't just about a few over-leveraged degens getting rekt; this is about the stability of the price discovery mechanism itself. The reported data shapes market sentiment, influences derivatives pricing, and guides the decisions of every participant from the smallest retail investor to the largest institution.If that data is a lie, then the entire market is trading on a fiction. This is precisely why the Bitcoin maximalist ethos remains so vital.Bitcoin's ledger is transparent, immutable, and verifiable by anyone, anywhere. There are no secret liquidations on the Bitcoin blockchain.What you see is what you get. The altcoin casino, and the CEXs that facilitate its most reckless behaviors, operate in the shadows.They create synthetic assets, promise unsustainable yields, and build towering edifices of leverage that inevitably collapse, and then they have the audacity to misreport the fallout. This incident should serve as a final, blaring alarm for anyone still holding significant assets on a centralized platform that you do not control the keys to.The 'not your keys, not your coins' mantra is not some cypherpunk platitude; it is the foundational lesson of every major crypto failure from Mt. Gox to FTX.Hyperliquid, as a decentralized perpetuals exchange, exists in a fundamentally different paradigm. Its operations are on-chain, its liquidation processes are transparent and governed by code, not by a CEO who might decide that bad news is bad for business.The fact that Yan can make this claim from a position of architectural transparency gives it immense weight. He is not a rival CEX CEO throwing mud; he is an architect of a more open system calling out the inherent flaws of the old guard.The consequences of this alleged underreporting are manifold. Regulators, who are already salivating at the chance to clamp down on this 'wild west' industry, now have a perfect exhibit A for why their oversight is 'needed.' It erodes the already-fragile credibility of the CEX model with institutional players who demand auditable, accurate data. Most importantly, it betrays the retail trader who logged in, saw a headline about a manageable number of liquidations, and had no idea that beneath the surface, a financial hurricane had just ravaged the landscape.This is more than a critique of data reporting; it is an indictment of a system that has repeatedly proven itself to be untrustworthy. The path forward is not to beg for better behavior from these centralized entities.The path forward is to build, use, and migrate to decentralized protocols where the truth is not something that is reported, but something that is mathematically verified and available for all to see. The market wipeout was painful, but the cover-up, if true, is the real crime.
It’s quiet here...Start the conversation by leaving the first comment.