Katy Waldman Reviews Mary McCarthy's Essay Collection
There’s a particular, almost alchemical, trust that forms when a critic’s voice resonates with a reader—a sense that you’re in the hands of a guide whose judgments, however sharp, are rendered with such crystalline authority and wit that you’re willing to follow them anywhere. This is the precise sensation Katy Waldman evokes in her review of Mary McCarthy’s essay collection, a piece that itself performs a delicate critical ballet.Waldman, with her own opaline assessments and zinging aperçus, channels the very spirit of McCarthy, an intellectual titan of the mid-20th century whose criticism was as feared as it was revered for its unsparing clarity and formidable erudition. To read Waldman on McCarthy is to witness a meeting of formidable minds across generations, a critic engaging not just with a subject but with a forebear in the art of the takedown and the celebration.McCarthy, a central figure in the New York intellectual scene, wielded her prose like a scalpel, dissecting the pretensions of literature, politics, and culture with a cool, analytical precision that could feel both brutal and exhilarating. Her essays, collected in volumes like *On the Contrary*, are masterclasses in argumentation, blending personal anecdote with sweeping historical analysis, and Waldman’s review instinctively grasps this duality.She is charmed, as any serious reader would be, by McCarthy’s ability to crystallize a complex idea in a single, devastating phrase—the kind of aperçu that lingers in the mind long after the page is turned. Yet, true to the critical tradition McCarthy herself embodied, Waldman does not succumb to pure hagiography.The admission that ‘one can quibble’ is profoundly significant; it’s the mark of a critic engaging at the highest level. Where McCarthy might find a novelist’s worldview facile or a political movement’s rhetoric hollow, Waldman turns that same discerning eye back on McCarthy herself.Perhaps she questions the occasional coldness of McCarthy’s judgments, the way her brilliant logic can sometimes steamroll nuance, or the very particular (and often privileged) vantage point from which those iconic assessments were made. This meta-critical layer—a review that is both an appreciation of critical style and a subtle demonstration of it—is what gives Waldman’s piece its depth.It situates McCarthy within the ongoing conversation about what criticism is for: is it a definitive verdict, a provocation to think, or a performance of intellect? In an era where hot takes and algorithmic opinion often masquerade as criticism, McCarthy’s commitment to rigor and Waldman’s thoughtful dissection of it serve as a potent reminder of the form’s highest aspirations. The review implicitly asks us to consider the legacy of such a voice.
#Mary McCarthy
#literary criticism
#book review
#essay
#editorial picks news
#One Touch of Nature
#Katy Waldman
#New Yorker
