The classroom lab I still remember

2 hours ago7 min read

Across nearly four decades navigating the intricate ecosystem of education—as a teacher, principal, superintendent, funder, and now the leader of a large nonprofit—the single most formative experience I carry with me wasn't a grand policy initiative or a glossy new program. It was a simple, unscripted Friday physics lab in a Brooklyn classroom, a space humming with the particular energy of adolescents on the cusp of a breakthrough.My students, faces etched with the fierce concentration of those wrestling with a stubborn idea, had confidently predicted a graph that, in the cold logic of physics, couldn't possibly exist: a vertical line representing velocity and time. What unfolded in the wake of that confident error was a beautiful, messy symphony of human cognition.The room dissolved into a chorus of confusion, then debate, then a collective dive into trial and error. I watched as shoulders slumped in frustration and then squared again with renewed determination.And then came the discovery, that electric 'a-ha!' moment that seems to physically brighten a room. Velocity, they realized with dawning clarity, isn't a solitary entity; it requires both displacement and time.In that brief, productive struggle, I, the teacher standing at the front, learned more about the authentic mechanics of learning than any policy memo or district mandate could ever hope to teach. It was a lesson in humility and in the profound power of intellectual friction.That moment endures in my memory not because of the corrected graph, but because it perfectly encapsulates what school, at its very best, should unlock every single day: genuine inquiry, dogged persistence, and the pure, unadulterated joy of figuring something out for yourself. It’s a feeling that connects every learner, from a child taking their first wobbly bicycle ride to a scientist on the verge of a paradigm-shifting discovery.Yet, so often, we still design educational experiences that bypass this essential struggle. Students move through their days executing a predetermined 'recipe' of steps—in math, in science, in history—following the instructions with precision but completely missing the flavor, the fundamental point of the exercise.This approach is tidy, manageable, and efficient for assessment, but it is fundamentally not transformative. It quietly shortchanges imagination, stifles innate curiosity, and robs young minds of those durable 'a-ha!' moments that cement knowledge not as a fact to be recalled, but as a truth to be understood.I've come to believe, through countless conversations with educators and students alike, that learning is only truly powerful when it weaves together a sense of agency, a clear purpose, innate curiosity, and genuine human connection, all working in concert to empower students for a future we can only partially envision. What does this look like in practice? It means learners must be given the space to pursue knowledge through action, through their own choices, and by using their own voices.They need opportunities to develop work that feels like an authentic and meaningful contribution, not just a graded assignment. They must be encouraged to explore new ideas and unfamiliar experiences to better map and understand their world, making connections not just between abstract concepts, but between those concepts, their own lives, and the people around them.When students are trusted to experiment—to wrestle productively with complex problems and, crucially, to recover gracefully from their mistakes—they don't just master content; they build the resilient habits of mind that matter profoundly in life and work: critical thinking, creative problem-solving, and collaborative grit. This philosophy finds a powerful ally in emerging technologies, which hold enormous potential to make these rich, inquiry-based experiences more common and accessible.The right tools can curate vivid simulations, prompt deeper inquiry with intelligent questioning, and scaffold experimentation in ways that allow every student to engage at their level. It can create entirely new entry points for learners to explore, revise, and connect their ideas.Sometimes, the most impactful technology isn't the most complex; it's the 'little' moments that matter immensely—a 90-second BrainPOP animation that suddenly unlocks a stubbornly difficult concept, an interactive module that sparks a heated classroom debate, or a quick, purposeful game that transforms rote practice into genuine understanding. These are the digital sparks that can turn a standard lesson into lasting learning.We must remember that technology is not a new recipe to follow slavishly; it's a dynamic set of instruments for students to conduct, a toolkit for their intellectual orchestra. If we genuinely want to cultivate learners who can think both with and about the coming wave of artificial intelligence, then our classrooms must be designed to invite students to do precisely what my Brooklyn high school physics class did: to make predictions, to test them rigorously, to argue passionately from evidence, and to revise their thinking without shame.This process of revision is particularly telling; it demonstrates the beautiful evolution in a student's thinking, showing how they move through the conceptual phases of understanding. Of course, realizing this vision requires deep commitments—equitable access to technology, sustained development of teacher expertise, and a relentless focus on quality of interaction over the sheer quantity of digital tools.I am profoundly heartened when I see schools like Ypsilanti Community High School in Michigan rising to meet this exact challenge with their new AI Lab. This first-of-its-kind collaboration between the school district, leading technology companies, and forward-thinking nonprofits equips students not just with theory, but with advanced, hands-on tools for AI-powered learning, including processors designed for complex computations and sophisticated 3D modeling software.The lab's genius is that it doesn't simply build AI literacy in the abstract; it allows students to explore ideas that genuinely matter to them using the same advanced technology shaping our world. In one fell swoop, they gain invaluable hands-on experience in emerging fields while simultaneously fostering a deep-seated sense of creativity and personal innovation.The lab challenges them to think critically, pushes them to be creatively bold, and strengthens the real-world problem-solving muscles they will need to flex for the rest of their lives. As we increasingly weave AI into the very fabric of our classrooms, we must fiercely protect the space for students to experiment and explore with it, to argue from evidence, to fail safely, and to struggle productively.When this is done right, you hear the right kind of noise. You walk into a classroom and it's buzzing with questions, alive with debates, and vibrating with the energy of students making connections they will carry for a lifetime.I still remember that Brooklyn lab as if it were yesterday, not because of the graph, but because of the profound human truth it revealed: when students are trusted to do the intellectual heavy lifting, when they are given the tools and the permission to truly engage, they will consistently surprise us—and, most importantly, they will surprise themselves. Our great and urgent job is to design schools where such discovery is not a happy accident, but the entire, deliberate plan.

#featured

#education

#learning

#inquiry

#technology

#AI

#student empowerment

#Digital Promise

Stay Informed. Act Smarter.

Get weekly highlights, major headlines, and expert insights — then put your knowledge to work in our live prediction markets.