Ante Delija protests controversial loss to Cortes-Acosta.

16 hours ago7 min read

The world of mixed martial arts was plunged into controversy following UFC Fight Night 263, as Croatian heavyweight Ante Delija launched a vehement protest against his knockout loss to Waldo Cortes-Acosta, a defeat he labels not just a setback but an outright 'robbery' that the sport has never witnessed before. The crux of the dispute lies in a pivotal moment in the first round where Delija, a formidable PFL veteran making his promotional debut, landed what he insists was an accidental finger to the eye of Cortes-Acosta.'I am not sure I hit him in the eye. I think I hit near it.I want the video where you can see this shot!' Delija exclaimed on social media, his frustration palpable. The sequence that followed has become the subject of intense scrutiny; the referee did indeed call a time-out to assess the Dominican 'Salsa Boy,' but after a brief pause, Cortes-Acosta chose to continue, a decision that led to his stunning knockout victory a mere thirty seconds later.For Delija, this is where the legitimacy of the bout completely unraveled. He argues the referee's initial intervention was the correct call for a foul, but the subsequent resumption of the fight was 'illegitimate,' a breach of protocol that allowed his opponent to 'sit and rest, enjoying the replays!' He further alleges that officials reviewed the contentious moment after the pause, an action he claims is also against the rules, giving Cortes-Acosta an unearned and critical recovery period.This incident isn't merely about a single fight's outcome; it strikes at the very heart of combat sports integrity, echoing historical controversies like the infamous 'Long Count' in the Jack Dempsey vs. Gene Tunney boxing match or more recent judging debacles in MMA that have forced athletic commissions to re-evaluate their standards.Delija's stance is one of a principled warrior, stating, 'I am not running from a loss. I respect every opponent and every result.But not when the rules are broken, and I am robbed. Not in this way.' His protest raises profound questions about the consistency of officiating under the Unified Rules of Mixed Martial Arts, the pressure on referees making split-second decisions in high-stakes environments, and the adequacy of instant replay protocols. Analysts are now dissecting the footage frame-by-frame, with some siding with Delija's claim of an unfair advantage, while others point to the fighter's responsibility to protect themselves at all times, a core tenet of the sport.The fallout is significant; for Cortes-Acosta, a hard-earned victory is now marred by an asterisk, and for Delija, a promising UFC debut has been overshadowed by a bitter dispute. This event will undoubtedly fuel ongoing debates about fighter safety, the clarity of foul rules, and whether the UFC, as the sport's premier organization, needs to advocate for more robust and transparent review processes to prevent such contentious endings from defining future cards. The call for 'only honesty' from Ante Delija is a powerful reminder that in the brutal ballet of the octagon, the integrity of the contest is as important as the result itself.

#UFC

#Ante Delija

#Cortes-Acosta

#fight controversy

#referee decision

#eye poke

#TKO

#featured

Stay Informed. Act Smarter.

Get weekly highlights, major headlines, and expert insights — then put your knowledge to work in our live prediction markets.