Entertainmentawards & festivals
Grammy Rules Exclude Blackpink Soloists from Best New Artist.
In the grand, often unpredictable theater of the music industry, where the Grammy Awards have long been considered the ultimate validation, a curious and deeply resonant dissonance emerged this year, striking a particularly sour chord with the global K-pop community. The case of BLACKPINK's supremely talented soloists—Jennie, Lisa, Rosé, and Jisoo—being deemed ineligible for the Best New Artist category, despite each member delivering monumental solo projects that collectively dominated charts and cultural conversations throughout the preceding year, exposes a fundamental flaw in the Recording Academy's archaic rulebook.This isn't merely about trophies; it's a profound question of artistic recognition and the systemic barriers that prevent it. To understand the gravity, one must first appreciate the unique architecture of BLACKPINK's success.The group itself is a global phenomenon, a powerhouse that shattered records and filled stadiums, yet the solo endeavors of its members represent a distinct, separate artistic baptism. Jennie's 'You & Me,' Lisa's electrifying 'LALISA,' Rosé's heart-wrenchingly beautiful '-R-', and Jisoo's record-shattering 'ME' were not mere group side-projects; they were individual statements, artistic manifestos that showcased unique vocal colors, personal narratives, and musical directions far removed from the collective BLACKPINK sound.They were, by every metric that should matter, debutante balls for four formidable artists stepping into their own spotlight. The crux of the issue lies in the Grammys' eligibility clause, which historically has been murky on how it treats members of established groups.The rules often seem to penalize artists for prior success under a collective banner, creating a paradoxical situation where an artist can be too famous to be 'new. ' This creates an impossible standard, especially in today's transnational music landscape where careers are built in layered, non-linear ways.It’s as if the Academy is listening with an ear tuned only to a bygone era, failing to recognize that an artist can be a veteran in one context and a thrilling newcomer in another. The backlash has been swift and justified, echoing past controversies where the Grammys' insularity has been called into question.From the initial snubbing of hip-hop to the ongoing debates about its relevance in the digital age, this incident with the BLACKPINK soloists feels like another chapter in a long story of the establishment playing catch-up with the vibrant, borderless reality of modern pop music. The message it sends is damaging: that the meticulous, years-long solo work of these women is somehow less legitimate because they once shared a stage.It dismisses the individual creative labor, the late nights in the studio perfecting a sound that is uniquely theirs, and the courage it takes to step out from under the umbrella of a world-conquering group. For the legions of fans and industry watchers, this exclusion is more than an oversight; it's a failure to acknowledge artistic evolution.It raises critical questions about what we truly mean by 'new artist. ' Is it merely a chronological first release, or is it the emergence of a definitive solo voice? By clinging to a rigid definition, the Grammys risk not only alienating a massive, engaged global audience but also cementing a reputation as an institution out of touch with the very artists who are defining the future of music.The solo projects of Jennie, Lisa, Rosé, and Jisoo were not just successful; they were cultural events that redefined the potential of a K-pop idol. To render them invisible in the Best New Artist conversation is to ignore a significant, groundbreaking movement in music itself, and the melody of that ignorance is one that history will not remember fondly.
#Grammy Awards
#Blackpink
#solo projects
#Best New Artist
#eligibility rules
#music industry
#K-pop
#featured