AIai regulationUS AI Policy
We’ve got to teach AI the right way.
The American educational system's chronic underperformance in teaching fundamental reading and mathematics—evidenced by our plummeting scores compared to nations with far fewer resources—casts a long, troubling shadow as we stand at the precipice of the artificial intelligence era. As a scientist and congenital optimist, I see this not just as a failure of the past but as a critical warning for the future; we cannot hope to navigate the complexities of teaching AI if we remain mired in the pedagogical struggles of the previous technological epoch.My optimism, however, is cautiously reinforced by two significant milestones that suggest a nascent national consensus is forming around the existential need to build generational AI skills, though wisdom must be their inseparable companion. The White House’s recent executive order, while commendable for its direct address of the need to 'cultivate the skills and understanding to use and create the next generation of AI technology,' represents the broad, conceptual 'must' of this endeavor.From my perspective, engaged with the subsequent White House Task Force on AI Education, the dominant theme has been the inexorable link between AI proficiency, national security, and economic prosperity—a narrative framed in the stark terms of global competition and maintaining American supremacy. Yet, this top-down impetus, crucial as it is, remains insufficient without the granular 'how,' a challenge that the state of Ohio has boldly undertaken by becoming the first to mandate that every school district adopt formal AI use policies.This regulatory framework, as articulated by officials like Chris Woolard, moves beyond mere encouragement to the arduous task of establishing guardrails for privacy, data quality, ethical use, and, most importantly, the cultivation of the critical thinking skills students will desperately need. This is where the real work begins, and it is enormously complicated.Building foundational pedagogical techniques for AI from scratch, with no historical baseline, mirrors the challenges we faced—and largely failed—with STEM education, where debates like whole language versus phonics left a significant portion of students, such as those with dyslexia, behind. We must learn from these mistakes, ensuring AI literacy becomes a core marker of educational success for all children, a task for which AI tools themselves may ironically provide assistance.The process of teaching AI shares a metaphorical kinship with developing it; both require iterative, focused training for improvement. But whereas the learning of large language models often occurs within an inscrutable black box, our approach to educating students about AI must be founded on absolute transparency and a commitment to continual improvement to prepare them for a radically changing workforce.The constitutional assignment of education to the states, juxtaposed with the federal government's broad conceptual vision, creates a complex landscape for implementation. Compounding this is the blistering pace of AI evolution, which demands an agility and responsiveness fundamentally at odds with the typically static nature of educational standards.The mission for educators is therefore doubly daunting: to set responsive, dynamic guardrails for a technology in perpetual flux while avoiding the culture wars that so often weaponize every aspect of curriculum. Drawing inspiration from Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics, we must embed ethical considerations and a profound understanding of societal impact into the very DNA of AI education from the outset, weighing the immense opportunities against the profound risks. The time for collaboration among educators, policymakers, and industry is now, for if we fail to teach AI the right way—with wisdom, ethics, and critical thinking at its core—we risk not just another generation of educational shortfalls, but of creating a powerful force we do not fully understand how to control.
#AI education
#White House executive order
#Ohio AI policies
#critical thinking
#ethics in AI
#featured